Cover story


October 17 , 2003
Vol. 28, No. 5

Late Night to go ‘Into the Phog’
KU pumps $2.4M into classrooms, technology
Women of Distinction
Classified employees support alternative to state civil service
Center of attention
‘88 champ ‘Manning’ the helm for homecoming

Rock Chalk sidewalk

Dinner to honor retirees
Admissions seeks student information
Bench inscription tells story behind Rock Chalk chant
CCL teaches leaders

Volunteer finds second family in Little Brother
Tuition assistance sees jump in fall numbers
Eaton Hall to be dedicated
A muddy good time

KU First
On the hill
Off the hill
Quiz


Calendar

Credits

Current jobs

In memory

KU people

News in brief

Web works

Archives

Contact Us

KU Faculty & Staff

News

UR homepage

KU homepage

Oread Deadline Schedule

Search

 

 

 

Classified employees support alternative to state civil service

By a margin of 54 to 46 percent, KU classified staff members have voted to pursue an alternative to civil service.


The decision will begin a process that could offer new opportunities for funding to support pay increases for classified staff.


A total of 1159 votes were returned to the Office of University Governance by the Oct. 14, deadline – a rate that represents 78 percent participation. Of the ballots that were returned, four were disqualified, 623 people voted yes and 532 voted no.


The vote was counted four times by members of the Classified Senate.

Representatives of a group wishing to remain part of the state civil service system observed the count.


The Work Group for an Alternative to Civil Service issued its first proposals for an alternative to civil service in February 2003. A series of town hall meetings, departmental meetings and meetings with Classified Senate took place over the spring semester.


In May, 1,090 classified staff members cast ballots to decide whether to pursue the change. Of those, 545 people voted for the alternative and 545 voted not to pursue the proposal.


In July, human resources circulated 1,465 surveys to classified staff via campus mail to gauge reaction to features of the proposal. More than 700 surveys were returned including information about how classified staff felt about the individual changes that were included in the proposal.


This summer, the work group surveyed classified staff to determine what aspects of the proposal were most or least liked. The work group developed a final version of the proposal taking into account the findings of the survey. The revised proposal was distributed to classified staff on Sept. 17.


Town hall meetings again were conducted to answer questions about the final proposal. About 300 classified staff members attended those meetings.


On Oct. 2, a second ballot was distributed to 1,479 classified staff members.
By a margin of 91 votes, respondents indicated their interest in pursuing an alternative to civil service.


University administration will now work through the Kansas Board of Regents to gain support for advancing the proposal to the Legislature.

    This site is maintained by University Relations, the public relations office for the University of Kansas Lawrence campus. Copyright 2001, the University of Kansas Office of University Relations. Images and information may be reused with notice of copyright, but not altered. kurelations@ukans.edu, (785) 864-3256